Keays v. Honda
Court of Appeal lessens 'whack' of trial judge's punitive damages award, though impact still felt
In March of 2006, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded Kevin Keays a record $500,000 in punitive damages, in addition to 24 months pay in lieu of notice, after Honda terminated Keays' employment for frequent work absences due to chronic fatigue syndrome. On September 29, 2006, the Ontario Court of Appeal held that the punitive damages awarded by the Superior Court should be dramatically reduced from $500,000 to $100,000. The Court of Appeal otherwise dismissed Honda's appeal of the Superior Court decision and, in doing so, rejected Honda's allegations of bias against the trial judge. [more]
Contracting parties beware: Court of Appeal implies duty of good faith
The Ontario Court of Appeal has recently held that, in certain circumstances, contracting parties owe a duty of good faith to one another and, further, that an "entire agreement" clause will not preclude the implication of a duty of good faith as a term of a contract. [more]
Dial D for deregulation. Massive deregulation and $15 m fines for abuse of dominance among major changes in Canada’s telecommunications industry
Massive deregulation and $15 m fines for abuse of dominance among major changes in Canada’s telecommunications industry
Canada's telecommunications industry is about to experience a massive shift from intrusive sectoral regulation to open markets. The Competition Bureau recently issued guidance on the application of the abuse of dominance provisions of the Competition Act to the telecommunications industry. Industry Minister Bernier has introduced legislation to provide for fines of up to $15 million against a telecommunications service provider found to have abused its dominant position. Mr. Bernier has also announced new rules that will accelerate deregulation of local telephone services. [more]
Lenders not liable for failing funds
If investors borrow money to invest in mutual funds, and the funds do not perform up to expectations, are the lending financial institutions on the hook? This question was the subject of the recent Court of Appeal decision in Baldwin et al. v. Daubrey et al. [more]
When an expert is not really an expert
A recent Ontario Superior Court decision serves as a strong reminder that counsel should ensure that their expert witness is in fact an expert and not merely an advocate dressed up as an expert. [more]
Contributors
Michael Binetti
Michael Binetti, a partner of the firm, brings a proven litigation background plus extensive experience in arguing both trials and appeals. He has demonstrated his strategic legal capability and expertise in wide-ranging areas of litigation. Michael’s peers and clients have commented that Michael is an “excellent and creative lawyer,” “finds unique solutions to complex problems,” and that “Michael gets it and knows how to win.”
Adam Casey
Adam’s litigation practice includes a range of matters involving civil and commercial litigation, shareholder disputes, administrative law, competition law, and insurance defence. Adam joined AGM having completed his articles at a leading international law firm and graduated from the McGill University Faculty of Law.
- Supreme Court of Canada clarifies when fraud by senior management will be attributed to a corporation
- Supreme Court of Canada affirms jurisdiction of securities commissions over out-of-province parties
- Court of Appeal Comments on Knowledge Requirement for Torts of Knowing Assistance and Knowing Receipt
Kenneth A. Dekker
Kenneth Dekker, a partner of the firm, is a successful trial and appellate lawyer who is valued by his clients as a resourceful and practical litigation counsel. Over more than two decades, Ken has litigated noteworthy cases in a range of fields that include class action defence, securities and broker-dealer litigation and regulatory defence, corporate and shareholder disputes (including oppression and winding up cases), defamation, civil fraud litigation, disputes over contracts, injunctions, professional liability litigation, employment litigation and cross-border litigation issues. Ken has appeared before all levels of courts in Ontario, including the Ontario Court of Justice, the Superior Court of Justice, the Divisional Court and the Court of Appeal for Ontario, as well as before the Supreme Court of Canada. Ken also represents and advises clients in regulatory matters before the Investment Industry Organization of Canada (IIROC), the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (MFDA) and the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC). Ken has been ranked as Repeatedly Recommended for Securities Litigation by Lexpert, for Corporate and Commercial Litigation by Best Lawyers of Canada, and he has been given the highest available rating of AV, or pre-eminent, by his peers on Martindale-Hubbell.
Meredith Hayward
Meredith has earned an impressive reputation for her skill and abilities in Commercial Litigation and Administrative Law, appearing at all levels of court in Ontario, before the British Columbia Court of Appeal, and before the Supreme Court of Canada.
John Rook
John F. Rook, KC, is a senior Canadian litigation lawyer with over 50 years of experience in competition law, commercial disputes, and administrative law. He is recognized as a leading competition litigator and has appeared before Canada’s Supreme Court and key tribunals.
Ardita Sinojmeri
Ardita joins Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP as an Associate Lawyer after completing her articles with the firm. Her growing practice encompasses a broad range of litigation matters including securities litigation, insurance defence, employment disputes, and shareholder disputes. Ardita earned her Juris Doctor from Western University’s Faculty of Law. Prior to joining the firm, she participated in a number of initiatives aimed at helping individuals and businesses struggling through COVID-19. Ardita looks forward to putting her legal, business, and community engagement skills to use in all the firm’s practice areas.
- Advisor’s Costly Conflict: Court Upholds OSC's $500K Penalty and Industry Ban against Advisor who inherited from elderly client
- The Ontario Court of Appeal Confirms: Independent Contractors Have a Duty to Mitigate
- Superior Court clarifies that unmet shareholder expectations do not always amount to oppression
Christopher Somerville
Chris brings a creative, strategic, and practical approach to litigation. His wide-ranging experience and expertise encompass numerous areas of law, including corporate/commercial, securities, employment, construction, product liability, asset recovery, and administrative law.
David N. Vaillancourt
David's practice expertise focuses on all matters of Commercial and Civil Litigation, Competition and Administrative Law. David has acted for clients in a wide range of disputes, including shareholder and partnership disputes, securities litigation, class action defence, proceedings under the Competition Act, employment law disputes, contract disputes, breach of confidence/intellectual property disputes, fidelity bond claims, and professional negligence claims. David has appeared before all levels of court in Ontario, including the Court of Appeal for Ontario, and has also appeared before the Competition Tribunal and the Federal Court of Appeal. David has appeared as lead counsel in numerous trials, hearings, and motions. David has been successful in numerous adversarial proceedings, and also has successfully negotiated the resolution of dozens of cases.
- Administrative Law (RSS) (23)
- Constitutional Law (RSS) (13)
- Municipal Law (RSS) (6)
- Political & Elections Law (RSS) (5)
- Announcements (RSS) (92)
- Canadian Law (RSS) (7)
- Canadian Law Whitepapers (RSS) (3)
- Case Summaries (RSS) (4)
- Commercial Litigation (RSS) (297)
- Anti-SLAPP (RSS) (3)
- Appeals and Judicial Review (RSS) (29)
- Arbitration (RSS) (20)
- Attacks on Business Interests (RSS) (5)
- Attacks on Reputation (RSS) (4)
- Banking Litigation (RSS) (10)
- Broker/Dealer litigation (RSS) (9)
- Civil Litigation (RSS) (13)
- Class Actions (RSS) (54)
- Conflicts of Law and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments (RSS) (16)
- Construction (including Performance and L&M Bond Defense) (RSS) (4)
- Corporate Litigation (RSS) (11)
- Debtor-Creditor and Banking Litigation (RSS) (11)
- Defamation (RSS) (9)
- Disputes over Contracts (RSS) (39)
- Disputes within Companies and Partnerships (RSS) (16)
- Employment Litigation (RSS) (32)
- Enforcement of Foreign Judgments (RSS) (7)
- Franchises (RSS) (4)
- Frauds, Misrepresentation, Deceit (RSS) (20)
- Injunctions (RSS) (10)
- Insurance Defence (RSS) (5)
- Intellectual Property (RSS) (5)
- International Trade (RSS) (6)
- Investor-State Disputes (RSS) (3)
- Legal Crisis Management (RSS) (2)
- Mediation and other Alternative Dispute Resolution (RSS) (8)
- Privacy Law (RSS) (4)
- Privilege (RSS) (1)
- Products Liability (RSS) (3)
- Professional Negligence and Discipline Hearings (RSS) (11)
- Remedies for Emergency Relief (RSS) (2)
- Securities Litigation (RSS) (74)
- Securities Regulatory (RSS) (13)
- Shareholder Litigation (RSS) (12)
- Speaking Engagements (RSS) (9)
- White Collar Crime (RSS) (5)
- Wrongful Dismissal (RSS) (12)
- Competition Law (RSS) (292)
- Abuse of Dominance (RSS) (11)
- Advice and Opinions (RSS) (2)
- Advice on Business Practices (RSS) (1)
- Anti-corruption (RSS) (10)
- CASL / Anti-Spam (RSS) (6)
- Civil Anti-Competitive Conduct (RSS) (26)
- Class Actions and Other Private Actions (RSS) (46)
- Competition Bureau Investigations (RSS) (28)
- Competition Tribunal Litigation (RSS) (18)
- Compliance Programs (RSS) (1)
- Conspiracy (RSS) (43)
- Consumer Protection (RSS) (22)
- Criminal Matters (RSS) (47)
- Fines & Settlements (RSS) (14)
- Indirect purchasers (RSS) (7)
- Marketing Practices and Telemarketing (RSS) (48)
- Mergers (RSS) (68)
- Private Actions (RSS) (12)
- Private Applications (RSS) (9)
- Developments (RSS) (215)
- In The Media (RSS) (32)
- Insurance Coverage Litigation (RSS) (4)
- Lawyer-Client Privilege (RSS) (1)
- Real Estate Litigation (RSS) (1)
- Uncategorized (RSS) (3)
- Year in Review / The Litigator (Print Edition) (RSS) (26)
