Class Actions were created to be a more efficient and cheaper option for a number of people with common claims based on the same circumstances. However, class actions (obviously) cannot be used where an individual’s claim is unique to them, as is typically the case where a client sues a financial advisor or investment advisor for not adequately advising them. These cases usually turn on what was said by the parties as well as the plaintiff’s knowledge and circumstances. However, the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Desjardins Financial Services Firm Inc. v. Asselin, 2020 SCC 30 suggests that there ... [more] Full article
More Recent Posts
- Alberta Court rules that an Alberta Securities Commission administrative penalty can survive bankruptcy
- Can an opinion be a misrepresentation? It depends on what you include in it. How misrepresentations made in opinions are treated under s. 138.3 of the Securities Act.
- Foreign Online Trading Platforms Pay Steep Fines to OSC
- Alberta court declines to certify class action alleging negligent performance of investment advisory services