Ontario’s top court overturns decision refusing leave to proceed with misrepresentation claim against mining company

In a decision released on May 24, 2023 in Markowich v. Lundin Mining, the Court of Appeal for Ontario overturned a Superior Court of Justice decision refusing leave to proceed under Part XXIII.1 of the Securities Act for a proposed class action brought by investors in mining company relating to its failure to publicly disclose information about pit wall instability and a rockslide at one of its Chilean open pit mines. A unanimous appeal panel found that the decision below had been overly restrictive in how it defined what amounts to a material change sufficient to impose a positive duty ... [more] Full article
SCC agrees to hear appeal on whether Securities Commission penalties can survive bankruptcy
On March 31, 2023, Canada’s top court granted leave to appeal from the B.C. Court of Appeal’s decision in Poonian v. British Columbia (Securities Commission) that a securities commission administrative ... [more] Full article
Court of Appeal Confirms No Duty to Disclose Beneficiary Changes
If a client asks their investment dealer to change their account beneficiary, does the dealer need to tell the beneficiary? Firms will be relieved by the Ontario Court of Appeal’s ... [more] Full article
Superior Court refuses leave to securities class action based on the difference between “Material Facts” and “Material Changes”
In a recent decision declining to grant leave under Part XXIII.1 of the Securities Act to proceed with a proposed class action on behalf of purchasers of securities on the ... [more] Full article
- Ontario’s top court reinstates securities class action against Cannabis company
- Fiduciary Duty for advisors not created by “Best Interest” standard alone
- Ontario Affirms Gatekeeping Function Of Robust Leave Test For Securities Class Actions
- Investment Dealers Could Face Class Actions for Systemic Breaches of their Duty to Inform