Investment Dealers Could Face Class Actions for Systemic Breaches of their Duty to Inform

Class Actions were created to be a more efficient and cheaper option for a number of people with common claims based on the same circumstances. However, class actions (obviously) cannot be used where an individual’s claim is unique to them, as is typically the case where a client sues a financial advisor or investment advisor for not adequately advising them. These cases usually turn on what was said by the parties as well as the plaintiff’s knowledge and circumstances. However, the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Desjardins Financial Services Firm Inc. v. Asselin, 2020 SCC 30 suggests that there ... [more] Full article
IIROC guidance highlights limitations on limitation of liability clauses in retail client account agreements
“By signing below, you agree not to sue me.” Not so fast, says Canada’s primary regulator of investment dealers. On October 10, 2019, the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ... [more] Full article
Alberta court declines to certify class action alleging negligent performance of investment advisory services
A proposed class proceeding for alleged negligent performance of investment advisory services was recently denied certification by the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta. In Fisher v Richardson GMP Limited, ... [more] Full article
Ignorance Is Not Bliss: Market Registrants Beware
A market registrant’s lack of actual knowledge of the source of tip or their tipper’s relationship to an issuer will not protect them from liability under the Securities Act, according ... [more] Full article