Michael Binetti

Michael Binetti*, Managing Partner of Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP, brings a wealth of litigation experience, with extensive expertise in both trials and appeals. Known for his strategic legal acumen, Michael has consistently demonstrated his ability to navigate complex cases and deliver successful outcomes across a wide range of litigation areas. Peers and clients alike praise Michael as an “excellent and creative lawyer” who “finds unique solutions to complex problems” and “knows how to win.” Recognized for his dedication and professionalism, he is described as a “strong advocate who always looks out for the best interests of his clients” and provides “timely, honest, and extremely valuable counsel.” Michael’s reputation for excellence is underscored by his inclusion in ranking services such as Best Lawyers, Lexology, and Lexpert.

Contributor's Profile

• Greenwashing Provisions Repealed: A Short-Lived Chapter in Competition Law
• From Funnel Cakes to Food Apps: Competition Bureau Takes Aim at Drip Pricing
• Where's the beef? Class action alleges price-fixing, restricting supply

69 More Posts

Adam Casey

Adam’s litigation practice includes a range of matters involving civil and commercial litigation, shareholder disputes, administrative law, competition law, and insurance defence. Adam joined AGM having completed his articles at a leading international law firm and graduated from the McGill University Faculty of Law.

Contributor's Profile

• Supreme Court of Canada clarifies when fraud by senior management will be attributed to a corporation
• Supreme Court of Canada affirms jurisdiction of securities commissions over out-of-province parties
• Court of Appeal Comments on Knowledge Requirement for Torts of Knowing Assistance and Knowing Receipt

3 More Posts

Kenneth A. Dekker

Ken Dekker, a partner of the firm, is a successful trial and appellate lawyer who is valued by his clients as a resourceful and practical litigation counsel. Over more than 25 years, Ken has litigated noteworthy cases in a range of fields that include class action defence, securities and broker-dealer litigation and regulatory defence, corporate and shareholder disputes (including oppression and winding up cases), defamation, civil fraud litigation, disputes over contracts, injunctions, professional liability litigation, employment litigation and cross-border litigation issues. Ken has appeared before all levels of courts in Ontario, including the Superior Court of Justice, the Divisional Court and the Court of Appeal for Ontario, as well as before the Supreme Court of Canada. Ken has also represented and advised clients in regulatory matters before the Investment Industry Organization of Canada (IIROC), the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (MFDA), both of which are now known as the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO). Ken has also represented clients before the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC), the Financial Planning Canada Standards Council (FPCSC), and the CPA Ontario Tribunal. Ken has been ranked for Corporate and Commercial Litigation by Best Lawyers of Canada, for Securities Litigation by Lexpert, and he has been given the highest available rating of AV, or pre-eminent, by his peers on "Martindale-Hubbell."

Contributor's Profile

• Supreme Court of Canada upholds Ontario Court of Appeal definition of Material Change
• Ontario's top court refuses consent order to "whitewash" Superior Court finding of misconduct
• Ontario Court of Appeal Clarifies "Public Correction" in Securities Class Actions

81 More Posts

Meganne Fletcher, Articling Student

Contributor's Profile

• When AI Gets It Wrong: Lessons from Mazaheri v Law Society of Ontario
• Contracting Out of Accountability? When Crypto Meets Canadian Courtroom Control
• Contract Interpretation, Oppression Remedies, and Limitation Periods – Oh my!

Meredith Hayward

Meredith has earned an impressive reputation for her skill and abilities in Commercial Litigation and Administrative Law, appearing at all levels of court in Ontario, before the British Columbia Court of Appeal, and before the Supreme Court of Canada.

Contributor's Profile

• Fiduciary Duty for advisors not created by “Best Interest” standard alone

13 More Posts

Masiel A. Matus

Masiel, a Partner of the firm, has a broad commercial litigation practice and represents both national and international clients in a variety of complex business matters. Masiel has expertise in cases involving shareholder disputes, contract disputes, corporate fraud, commercial leasing and real property disputes, breach of trust, professional negligence, D&O claims, and employment matters. Masiel is a tough-minded advocate dedicated to obtaining results for her clients.

Contributor's Profile

• SCC to Consider Spoliation: Remedies for Document Destruction 
• Lying to home insurer regarding living expenses leads to denial of entire claim
• Slapping a woman’s buttocks at work is just cause for termination, but not wilful misconduct?

41 More Posts

William McLennan

Contributor's Profile

• Court of Appeal declines to enforce jurisdiction clause

John Rook

John F. Rook, KC, is a senior Canadian litigation lawyer with over 50 years of experience in competition law, commercial disputes, and administrative law. He is recognized as a leading competition litigator and has appeared before Canada’s Supreme Court and key tribunals.

Contributor's Profile

• Understanding the Chilling Effect on Mergers and Market Share
• Competition If Necessary: Balancing Policy & Consumer Welfare in Canadian Competition Law

Jeanette Saliba

Jeanette joins Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP from Osgoode Hall Law School. Throughout law school, she participated in various moots and was part of the oral advocacy club. During her education, she strived to assist entrepreneurs in the business law clinic. Prior to starting her articles, she gained experience conducting hearings for Small Claims Court matters. Jeanette looks forward to putting her business skills and passion for advocacy to use in the firm’s practice areas.

Contributor's Profile

• Ontario Court of Appeal upholds Enforcement of German Judgment despite Arbitration Clause
• Ontario Court Upholds Termination Clause, Backing Employer Rights
• From Ink to Emojis: The New Era of Enforceable Contract Signatures

7 More Posts

Ardita Sinojmeri

Ardita Sinojmeri, Associate Lawyer at Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP, has a broad litigation practice spanning commercial litigation, securities litigation, insurance defence, employment disputes, and administrative law. She has appeared before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and the Ontario Court of Appeal. Ardita earned her Juris Doctor from Western University’s Faculty of Law. Before joining the firm, she was involved in initiatives supporting individuals and businesses navigating complex legal and financial challenges. She was also an Intake Coordinator for the National Canadian Lawyers’ Initiative and has authored legal scholarship, including “Spinning its Wheels: The Canadian Mining Industry’s Human Rights Failures in Guatemala” (2020) in the Mining Law, Finance & Sustainability Research Publication Series.

Contributor's Profile

• Advisor’s Costly Conflict: Court Upholds OSC's $500K Penalty and Industry Ban against Advisor who inherited from elderly client
• The Ontario Court of Appeal Confirms: Independent Contractors Have a Duty to Mitigate
• Superior Court clarifies that unmet shareholder expectations do not always amount to oppression

4 More Posts

Christopher Somerville

Chris brings a creative, strategic, and practical approach to litigation. His wide-ranging experience and expertise encompass numerous areas of law, including corporate/commercial, securities, employment, construction, product liability, asset recovery, and administrative law. Chris has represented clients as lead counsel at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Court of Appeal for Ontario, and Ontario Securities Commission. Beyond Ontario courts and tribunals, Chris has advocated before the Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Canada Border Services Agency, and the Federal Court of Appeal. He is proud to have acted for national and international corporations, investment dealers and advisors, insurance companies, labour unions, charities, high-net-worth individuals, and working families. Chris is also honoured to be legal counsel for the Canadian Crime Stoppers Association and Ontario Association of Crime Stoppers. He has published on the subject of informer privilege in The Advocates’ Journal and has presented at the Canadian Institute’s Law of Policing Conference. Before private practice, Chris received the John Yaremko Award in Human Rights during law school at the University of Toronto. He also mooted in French at the Laskin constitutional and administrative law competition, and his team won First Place Pair and Second Place Factum.

Contributor's Profile

• Chris Somerville Speaks at CIRO Seminar
• Ontario's top court defines "material change" in securities litigation
• Court of Appeal Confirms No Duty to Disclose Beneficiary Changes

15 More Posts

David N. Vaillancourt

David is a determined and committed advocate for his clients. David has extensive courtroom experience, having successfully appeared as lead counsel in trials, hearings, motions, and appeals. David is also a skillful negotiator, having successfully negotiated the resolution of numerous cases. David is ranked as a leading practitioner in competition law by both Lexpert and Who’s Who Legal, and has been recognized by Best Lawyers for his expertise in corporate and commercial litigation, and competition law. David is also rated as AV Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell (the highest rating possible), with his peers at competitor law firms noting that David is an “excellent lawyer and advocate”, he is “diligent and creative in his approach”, and “is capable of taking charge in the largest commercial and insurance claims”. David has a broad practice in commercial litigation, insurance law, and competition law.

Contributor's Profile

• Competition Tribunal Shuts Door on First Public Interest Leave Bid Against Google & Apple
• Martin v. Alphabet: Searching for Private Enforcement at the Competition Tribunal
• The Private Competition Enforcement Review, 18th Edition

39 More Posts