Allied Nevada plaintiffs denied leave to advance Securities Act claims against underwriters
In a recent decision, Ontario Superior Court Justice Edward P. Belobaba found that two investment dealers are not experts under the Ontario Securities Act – and they couldn’t be happier about it. In particular, it has been clarified that underwriters are not “experts” and therefore not proper targets for shareholder misrepresentation claims under Part XXIII.1 of the Securities Act that provides for liability for misrepresentations to investors on the secondary market. In July and August 2014, gold mining company Allied Nevada and two of its executives were sued in the Ontario Superior Court by several investors in a proposed class ... [more] Full article
Lenders’ misrepresentation claim against auditor summarily dismissed
In the latest chapter in an almost 20-year-old saga involving Philip Services Corp. (“Philip”) and an accounting fraud uncovered in 1998, Ontario Superior Court Justice Perell summarily dismissed a negligent ... [more] Full article
After the Storm: only CIBC and IMAX class actions survive
In Ontario, the last four years have been overcast for securities class actions. The clouds lifted last week, when the Supreme Court clarified a critical limitation period by overturning the ... [more] Full article
Ontario’s top court affirms denial of leave to amend claim in secondary market misrepresentation class action
The requirement for leave of the court in order to proceed with secondary market claims under Part XXIII.1 of the Securities Act continues to evolve and be the subject of extensive judicial commentary almost ten years after it came into force. [more] Full article