The Investment Dealers’ Association found not to owe a duty of care to disgruntled investors
Morgis v. Thomson Kernaghan & Co. (2003), 65 O.R. (3d) 321 (C.A.) In a recent decision, Ontario’s highest Court considered whether liability can be imposed on the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (the “IDA”) for the economic losses sustained by investors in their margin accounts with an IDA member. As a result of sustaining substantial losses in their margin accounts, several investors sued their investment dealer, Thomson Kernaghan & Co. (“Thomson”). Thomson’s IDA membership was subsequently suspended, and it was petitioned into bankruptcy. The investors then sought to add the IDA and certain IDA directors and officers as defendants. The ... [more] Full article
“Know Your Client Rule” Takes on New Importance
THE RULE When asked to speak on the impact of technological changes taking place in the retail stock market on the "Know Your Client Rule", I was somewhat at a ... [more] Full article