Apple’s iPhone smartphone enjoys market power, but terms imposed by Apple on wireless carriers did not harm competition, the Competition Bureau concluded recently. The Bureau analyzed Apple’s terms under the Competition Act’s abuse of dominance provisions. The iPhone’s market position, profitability, and status as a must-carry device for wireless carriers led the Bureau to conclude that it enjoys market power, thus meeting the first requirement of the abuse of dominance provisions. The Bureau thus looked at three types of clauses in Apple’s agreements with wireless carriers: minimum order quantities or other volume commitments most‑favoured nation or any other term that required preferential or ... [more] Full article