The Litigator LiveThe Litigator Live
AGM :: Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP

THE LITIGATOR LIVE

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
365 Bay Street, Suite 200  ·  Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800  ·  info@agmlawyers.com

price maintenance

Competition Law Review – May 2009

May 1st, 2009 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Competition Law, Year in Review / The Litigator (Print Edition)

Contributors: Michael Osborne, Sonny Ingram, Sandra Monardo, Michelle Booth, Adam Wygodny, and Donna Wilson.

Top stories
Canada’s new competition law
Budget 2009 includes the most significant amendments to the Competition Act in a generation:
• A new “per se” conspiracy offence makes it illegal for competitors or potential competitors to fix prices, allocate markets, or control production of a product, even if there is no effect on competition…and more…

Full article

Competition Law Year in Review 2007

February 1st, 2008 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Competition Law, Year in Review / The Litigator (Print Edition)

Contributors: Michael Osborne , Jennifer Cantwell, Sandra Monardo, Michelle Booth, Sonny Ingram, Hooman Zardarzadeh

TOP STORIES
Ice storm
Ice supplier Arctic Glacier Inc. tried to crush its fledgling competitor, Polar Ice Express Inc. by unlawfully interfering with its economic relations, an Alberta court found…

Full article

Review of Competition Law – April 2007

April 11th, 2007 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Competition Law, Year in Review / The Litigator (Print Edition)

THE LITIGATOR – Review of Competition Law – April 2007

Contributors: Michael Osborne , Jennifer Cantwell, Kyle Peterson , Sonny Ingram, Michael Binetti, and Adam Wygodny

TOP STORIES

Appeal court revises test for abuse of dominant position
In identifying anti-competitive acts, one must ask whether the conduct had an intended predatory, exclusionary or disciplinary effect on a competitor, not on competition, the Federal Court of Appeal held in overturning the Tribunal’s 2005 finding that Canada Pipe’s rebate program was not anti-competitive….

Full article

Court refuses to certify indirect purchaser class because of difficulties in proving liability:Chadha v. Bayer Inc.

November 23rd, 2003 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Competition Law, Private Actions

In its recent decision in Chadha v. Bayer Inc., the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the Divisional Court’s refusal to certify a class of indirect purchasers of pigments used to colour bricks. The Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal on July 17, 2003.

Full article

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
365 Bay Street, Suite 200  ·  Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800  ·  
.