Aggregate Assessment of Damages Allows Certification of Conspiracy Class Actions, Courts Hold
by Michael Osborne, Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
Irving Paper Ltd. v. Atofina Chemicals Inc. and Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Infineon Technologies AG
In two recent decisions, the Ontario Superior Court and the British Columbia Court of Appeal relied on the aggregate damages provisions of the Class Proceedings Act in their respective provinces to certify class actions seeking damages for alleged conspiracies to fix prices for hydrogen peroxide and DRAM memory chips. In doing this, both courts side-stepped the requirement in the aggregate damages provisions that liability must be proved before damages can be assessed in the aggregate. A close examination of the decisions suggests, however, that the courts have in effect done away with this statutory requirement.
(Published on pg 82, Canadian Competition Record, Winter 2010, Vol. 23, No. 3)
By Michael Osborne
April 26th, 2010
Categories
Competition Law, Conspiracy, Private Actions
Tags
Atofina Chemicals, british columbia court, Class Actions, DRAM, DRAM memory, hydrogen perozide, Infineon Technologies, Irving Paper, Pro-Sys Consultants
Recommend Article
del.icio.us
Digg
Newsvine
NowPublic
365 Bay Street, Suite 200 · Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800 ·

