CRTC cannot make cablecos pay for local TV signals, SCC says
Cable and satellite television companies won an important victory when the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on December 13, 2012, that the CRTC has no jurisdiction to force them to pay to redistribute local television broadcasts to their audiences. This decision may herald a trend to confining subordinate bodies like the CRTC more narrowly to the areas of jurisdiction granted to them by Parliament. CRTC proposes “value for signal” regime Currently, cable and satellite TV companies (known as “broadcast distribution undertakings”, or “BDUs”) do not pay television broadcasters to distribute over-the-air television signals to local audiences. The Copyright Act expressly [...] Full article
Osborne comments on Etobicoke Centre election case for SUN TV’s Daily Brief
Michael Osborne summarized both sides of the argument in the Etobicoke Centre election case that was recently heard by the Supreme Court for Sun TV’s Daily Brief. Full article
No defined limit on AMPs, court says
A recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal upholding the Ontario Securities Commission power to impose administrative monetary penalties, or AMPs, of up to $1 million suggests that even [...] Full article
Democracy and the rule of law
Democracy and the rule of law are cornerstones of the Canadian constitution. These concepts have been appealed to by both sides in the dispute over the Harper government’s plan to [...] Full article










Recent Comments
Canada's anti-bribery law to be strengthened
Read The Litigator Blog [...]
Alberta company charged with foreign corruption
Read The Litigator Blog [...]
Pre-merger notification threshold increased to $80 million
Former Bennett Environmental Inc. executive Robert Griffiths is a case in point. On September [...]