<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Litigator - Affleck Greene McMurtry, LLP &#187; Private Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/topics/competition-law/private-applications-competition-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca</link>
	<description>Competition Law,  Commercial Litigation and Arbitration Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 01:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>UCDA and IBC reach settlement</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2013/01/ucda-and-ibc-reach-settlement/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ucda-and-ibc-reach-settlement</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2013/01/ucda-and-ibc-reach-settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Masiel A. Matus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Anti-Competitive Conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition Tribunal Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=2086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Used Car Dealers Association of Ontario and the Insurance Bureau of Canada have settled UCDA&#8217;s refusal to deal case. UCDA is a trade association representing 4,500 Ontario car dealers. Its Auto Check service provides dealers with information about the accident history of used vehicles. UCDA needs claims data from IBC to offer Auto Check.&#160;<a href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/2013/01/ucda-and-ibc-reach-settlement/">[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2013/01/ucda-and-ibc-reach-settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Private applicants flock to Tribunal</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2008/06/private-applicants-flock-to-tribunal/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=private-applicants-flock-to-tribunal</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2008/06/private-applicants-flock-to-tribunal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>W. Michael G. Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competition Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition Tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disputes within Companies and Partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iata paper tickets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadeau ferme agricole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators hockey tickets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.agmlawyers.com/litigatorrss.asp?file=archive/reslibrary_archives_private20080605_content</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do hockey, chickens, and airlines have in common? They have all been the subject of recent private applications in the Competition Tribunal. On April 11, the Tribunal refused leave to John Annable to bring a private application attacking multi-game ticket packages for Senators hockey games. Then, on May 12, it granted leave to Nadeau&#160;<a href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/2008/06/private-applicants-flock-to-tribunal/">[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2008/06/private-applicants-flock-to-tribunal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parliamentary privilege trumps Competition Act, Tribunal rules</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2007/09/parliamentary-privilege-trumps-competition-act-tribunal-rules/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=parliamentary-privilege-trumps-competition-act-tribunal-rules</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2007/09/parliamentary-privilege-trumps-competition-act-tribunal-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>W. Michael G. Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competition Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Capital News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliamentary Press Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refusal to deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gautier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a 10 year struggle, Robert Gauthier, proprietor of now defunct The National Capital News Canada tried unsuccessfully to renew his application to the Competition Tribunal to force the Speaker of the House of Commons to grant him access to the Parliamentary Press Gallery.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2007/09/parliamentary-privilege-trumps-competition-act-tribunal-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dolby complaint silenced</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2007/06/dolby-complaint-silenced/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dolby-complaint-silenced</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2007/06/dolby-complaint-silenced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>W. Michael G. Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Anti-Competitive Conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refusal to deal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sono Pro Inc., a Montreal professional audio equipment reseller, has lost its attempt to force Sonotechnique P.J.L. Inc. to supply it with Dolby products.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2007/06/dolby-complaint-silenced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tribunal restores Sherbrooke store to Rona</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/07/tribunal-restores-sherbrooke-store-to-rona/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tribunal-restores-sherbrooke-store-to-rona</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/07/tribunal-restores-sherbrooke-store-to-rona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>W. Michael G. Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Anti-Competitive Conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 30, the Competition Tribunal ruled that home improvement retailer Rona Inc. can keep a store it had agreed to sell in order to gain Competition Bureau approval of its acquisition of competitor R&#233;no-D&#233;pot in 2003, because of a &#8220;change in circumstances&#8221;.[1] Rona&#8217;s application was under s. 106 of the Competition Act, a provision&#160;<a href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/07/tribunal-restores-sherbrooke-store-to-rona/">[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/07/tribunal-restores-sherbrooke-store-to-rona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
