<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Litigator - Affleck Greene McMurtry, LLP &#187; Mediation and other Alternative Dispute Resolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/topics/commercial-litigation/mediation-alternative-dispute-resolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca</link>
	<description>Competition Law,  Commercial Litigation and Arbitration Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 01:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Table Manners &#8211; Recipes for Negotiators</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2013/04/table-manners-recipes-for-negotiators/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=table-manners-recipes-for-negotiators</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2013/04/table-manners-recipes-for-negotiators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Hon. David C. Dingwall, P.C., Q.C.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advice and Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disputes over Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disputes within Companies and Partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediation and other Alternative Dispute Resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dispute Resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=2372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The legendary basketball coach, John Wooden, once said:  “A failure to prepare is preparing to fail.”  The same can be said of the negotiator.  Preparation is another crucial determinant of the negotiating process.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2013/04/table-manners-recipes-for-negotiators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wayward Fiduciary entitled to receive bonus from former Employer, says Court of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/02/wayward-fiduciary-entitled-to-receive-bonus-from-former-employer-says-court-of-appeal/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wayward-fiduciary-entitled-to-receive-bonus-from-former-employer-says-court-of-appeal</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/02/wayward-fiduciary-entitled-to-receive-bonus-from-former-employer-says-court-of-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David N. Vaillancourt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Appeals and Judicial Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disputes within Companies and Partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frauds, Misrepresentation, Deceit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediation and other Alternative Dispute Resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiduciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International and Domestic Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary development corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rosette]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=1137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mady Development Corp. v. Rossetto, 2012 ONCA 31, reaffirmed the principle that equitable relief is always discretionary and fact specific.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/02/wayward-fiduciary-entitled-to-receive-bonus-from-former-employer-says-court-of-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No class action where arbitrator has jurisdiction, court holds</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2006/06/no-class-action-where-arbitrator-has-jurisdiction-court-holds/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=no-class-action-where-arbitrator-has-jurisdiction-court-holds</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2006/06/no-class-action-where-arbitrator-has-jurisdiction-court-holds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Gabor, Summer Student</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediation and other Alternative Dispute Resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension plans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Class action legislation does not give courts jurisdiction over cases that would otherwise be dealt with by tribunals or arbitrators, the Supreme Court held in Concordia v. Bisaillon.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2006/06/no-class-action-where-arbitrator-has-jurisdiction-court-holds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mediation Confidentiality Preserved: Rudd v. Trossacs Investments</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2006/05/mediation-confidentiality-preserved-rudd-v-trossacs-investments/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mediation-confidentiality-preserved-rudd-v-trossacs-investments</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2006/05/mediation-confidentiality-preserved-rudd-v-trossacs-investments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 19:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meredith Hayward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediation and other Alternative Dispute Resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternate dispute resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meredith Hayward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[without prejudice privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[witnesses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mediators breathed a collective sigh of relief when the Ontario Divisional Court upheld the confidentiality of mediations by refusing to compel a mediator to testify about communications between parties at a mediation. Rudd v. Trossacs Investments]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2006/05/mediation-confidentiality-preserved-rudd-v-trossacs-investments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
