CRTC cannot make cablecos pay for local TV signals, SCC says
Cable and satellite television companies won an important victory when the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on December 13, 2012, that the CRTC has no jurisdiction to force them to pay to redistribute local television broadcasts to their audiences. This decision may herald a trend to confining subordinate bodies like the CRTC more narrowly to the areas of jurisdiction granted to them by Parliament. CRTC proposes “value for signal” regime Currently, cable and satellite TV companies (known as “broadcast distribution undertakings”, or “BDUs”) do not pay television broadcasters to distribute over-the-air television signals to local audiences. The Copyright Act expressly [...] Full article
Hollywood studios successfully enforce breach of copyright judgment against Ontario website operator
Citing the Internet's unique potential to cause harm anywhere and everywhere, Madam Justice Lax of Ontario's Superior Court of Justice enforced a New York District Court judgment earlier this month against the operators of Ontario-based websites that facilitated the illegal copying and downloading of movies. Full article
Intellectual property is not exempt from Competition Act’s reach
Eli Lilly and Co. v. Apotex Inc. On November 2 2005, the Federal Court of Appeal held that where an agreement to assign a patent increases the assignee’s market power [...] Full article
Developments
A Cautionary Tale in Comparative Advertising
National Energy Corporation was recently ordered by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice to stop [...]
More Developments










Recent Comments
Canada's anti-bribery law to be strengthened
Read The Litigator Blog [...]
Alberta company charged with foreign corruption
Read The Litigator Blog [...]
Pre-merger notification threshold increased to $80 million
Former Bennett Environmental Inc. executive Robert Griffiths is a case in point. On September [...]