<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Litigator - Affleck Greene McMurtry, LLP &#187; Insurance Defence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/topics/commercial-litigation/insurance-defence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca</link>
	<description>Competition Law,  Commercial Litigation and Arbitration Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 01:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Court of Appeal at fault, 30 class actions become a total loss</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/12/court-of-appeal-at-fault-30-class-actions-become-a-total-loss/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=court-of-appeal-at-fault-30-class-actions-become-a-total-loss</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/12/court-of-appeal-at-fault-30-class-actions-become-a-total-loss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 00:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Emerson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Appeals and Judicial Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appellate jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statutory interpretation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last summer, in David Polowin Real Estate Ltd. v. Dominion of Canada General Insurance Co., the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned its own decision on a question of law it decided just a few years ago in McNaughton Automotive Ltd. v. Co-operators General Insurance Co. In so doing, the Court wrestled with whether and when it could, or should, overrule one of its past decisions.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/12/court-of-appeal-at-fault-30-class-actions-become-a-total-loss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure to identify changes in insured risks can render policies voidable</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/11/failure-to-identify-changes-in-insured-risks-can-render-policies-voidable/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=failure-to-identify-changes-in-insured-risks-can-render-policies-voidable</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/11/failure-to-identify-changes-in-insured-risks-can-render-policies-voidable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Emerson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure obligations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dishonest employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic funds transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial institution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario court of appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court of canada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An insured must inform its insurer of any facts that affect its insurability or that an insurer would consider relevant in assessing risk. This duty to disclose such facts exists even in the absence of a specific request for them. An insured may face coverage issues if it breaches this obligation and withholds facts that&#160;<a href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/11/failure-to-identify-changes-in-insured-risks-can-render-policies-voidable/">[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/11/failure-to-identify-changes-in-insured-risks-can-render-policies-voidable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
