<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Litigator - Affleck Greene McMurtry, LLP &#187; Enforcement of Foreign Judgments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/topics/commercial-litigation/enforcement-of-foreign-judgments-commercial-litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca</link>
	<description>Competition Law,  Commercial Litigation and Arbitration Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 01:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Courts have power to grant injunctions against parties outside their jurisdiction</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2008/01/courts-have-power-to-grant-injunctions-against-parties-outside-their-jurisdiction/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=courts-have-power-to-grant-injunctions-against-parties-outside-their-jurisdiction</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2008/01/courts-have-power-to-grant-injunctions-against-parties-outside-their-jurisdiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sonny Ingram</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement of Foreign Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian travel company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement of foreign judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forum non conveniens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexican corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[puerto vallarta hotel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quebec superior court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superior court of quebec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late last spring, a unanimous Supreme Court of Canada affirmed that the provinces' Superior Courts have the jurisdiction to issue injunctions with purely extraterritorial effects.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2008/01/courts-have-power-to-grant-injunctions-against-parties-outside-their-jurisdiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The letters rogatory that got away</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2007/06/the-letters-rogatory-that-got-away/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-letters-rogatory-that-got-away</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2007/06/the-letters-rogatory-that-got-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sonny Ingram</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement of Foreign Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict of laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depositions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[examination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial assistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letters of request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letters rogatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Superior Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relevance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relevant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sudan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talisman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last fall, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned an order enforcing a request for international judicial assistance (also known as letters rogatory) that sought to compel a former executive of a Talisman Energy Inc. subsidiary to be deposed in a U.S. action.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2007/06/the-letters-rogatory-that-got-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood studios successfully enforce breach of copyright judgment against Ontario website operator</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2006/04/hollywood-studios-successfully-enforce-breach-of-copyright-judgment-against-ontario-website-operator/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hollywood-studios-successfully-enforce-breach-of-copyright-judgment-against-ontario-website-operator</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2006/04/hollywood-studios-successfully-enforce-breach-of-copyright-judgment-against-ontario-website-operator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 21:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth A. Dekker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement of Foreign Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounting for profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beals v. Saldanha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict of laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial comity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie studios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order and fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real and substantial connection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOCAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twentieth Century Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Studios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citing the Internet's unique potential to cause harm anywhere and everywhere, Madam Justice Lax of Ontario's Superior Court of Justice enforced a New York District Court judgment earlier this month against the operators of Ontario-based websites that facilitated the illegal copying and downloading of movies.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2006/04/hollywood-studios-successfully-enforce-breach-of-copyright-judgment-against-ontario-website-operator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreign litigants beware</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/11/foreign-litigants-beware/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=foreign-litigants-beware</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/11/foreign-litigants-beware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 01:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth A. Dekker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement of Foreign Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disputes over Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement of foreign judgements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leveltek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madam Justice Aitken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statement of claim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Notice of Intent to Defend is the shortest of the pleadings that may be filed in an Ontario action and, in most cases, is of little consequence. Comprised of a single page and saying little beyond what its title already indicates, a Notice of Intent to Defend is normally used only to notify the&#160;<a href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/11/foreign-litigants-beware/">[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/11/foreign-litigants-beware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
