<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Litigator - Affleck Greene McMurtry, LLP &#187; Debtor-Creditor and Banking Litigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/topics/commercial-litigation/debtor-creditor-banking-litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca</link>
	<description>Competition Law,  Commercial Litigation and Arbitration Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 01:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Court pierces corporate veil on alter ego theory of liability</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/05/court-pierces-corporate-veil-on-alter-ego-theory-of-liability/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=court-pierces-corporate-veil-on-alter-ego-theory-of-liability</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/05/court-pierces-corporate-veil-on-alter-ego-theory-of-liability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Binetti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debtor-Creditor and Banking Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disputes over Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disputes within Companies and Partnerships]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=1382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Chan v. City Commercial Realty Group Ltd., the court &#8220;pierced the corporate veil&#8221; to hold the principals of a real estate brokerage personally liable for the debts of their corporation. The corporate defendant, City Commercial Realty Services (Canada) Ltd. (&#8220;City 1&#8221;), had initially sued the plaintiffs in respect of a real estate transaction, which&#160;<a href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/05/court-pierces-corporate-veil-on-alter-ego-theory-of-liability/">[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/05/court-pierces-corporate-veil-on-alter-ego-theory-of-liability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Request to Admit served during adjournment of trial allowed by court</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/04/request-to-admit-served-during-adjournment-of-trial-allowed-by-court/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=request-to-admit-served-during-adjournment-of-trial-allowed-by-court</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/04/request-to-admit-served-during-adjournment-of-trial-allowed-by-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Binetti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debtor-Creditor and Banking Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frauds, Misrepresentation, Deceit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=1351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the case of Sivaji v. Rajwani, [2011] O.J. No. 6270, 108 O.R. (3d) 478, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice allowed a Request to Admit to be served during a long adjournment of the trial. Justice A.D. Grace found that there is no inviolate rule that service of a Request to Admit has to&#160;<a href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/04/request-to-admit-served-during-adjournment-of-trial-allowed-by-court/">[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/04/request-to-admit-served-during-adjournment-of-trial-allowed-by-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank cannot freeze client’s account at subsidiary absent court order</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2011/04/bank-cannot-freeze-clients-account-at-subsidiary-absent-court-order/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bank-cannot-freeze-clients-account-at-subsidiary-absent-court-order</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2011/04/bank-cannot-freeze-clients-account-at-subsidiary-absent-court-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Binetti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debtor-Creditor and Banking Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitrage scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeze assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal bank of canada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the case of Royal Bank of Canada v. Ankur Rastogi[1] , the Ontario Court of Appeal held that RBC could not freeze the accounts of its client at its subsidiary, RBC Direct Investing, pending the determination of its lawsuit against the client. It further held that funds being held by another financial institution pursuant&#160;<a href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/2011/04/bank-cannot-freeze-clients-account-at-subsidiary-absent-court-order/">[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2011/04/bank-cannot-freeze-clients-account-at-subsidiary-absent-court-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fraud victims may not enjoy priority standing in bankruptcy proceedings</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2011/03/court-of-appeal-sets-out-principles-for-constructive-trust-remedy-in-bankruptcy-proceedings/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=court-of-appeal-sets-out-principles-for-constructive-trust-remedy-in-bankruptcy-proceedings</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2011/03/court-of-appeal-sets-out-principles-for-constructive-trust-remedy-in-bankruptcy-proceedings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David N. Vaillancourt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debtor-Creditor and Banking Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frauds, Misrepresentation, Deceit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court of appeal for ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent decision, The Court of Appeal for Ontario clarified the circumstances under which a constructive trust remedy will be granted in favour of victims of fraud once a fraudster enters bankruptcy proceedings.

In Credifinance Securities Limited v. DSLC Capital Corp,[1] DSLC made a $400,000 loan to Credifinance. Some time later, Credifinance defaulted on the repayment of the loan. DSLC came to suspect that the loan was obtained by way of fraudulent misrepresentations.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2011/03/court-of-appeal-sets-out-principles-for-constructive-trust-remedy-in-bankruptcy-proceedings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Interest Rates Right</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2004/05/getting-interest-rates-right/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=getting-interest-rates-right</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2004/05/getting-interest-rates-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 16:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>W. Michael G. Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debtor-Creditor and Banking Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash advances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class proceeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mbna canada bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service charges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In April 2004, the Supreme Court ordered Enbridge Gas Distribution to pay back late payment penalties charged to gas customers that exceeded the limit on interest rates in the Criminal Code. This decision provides a reminder that companies that are not careful in setting interest rates can get into trouble.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2004/05/getting-interest-rates-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collecting from Guarantors</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/1996/04/collecting-from-guarantors/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=collecting-from-guarantors</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/1996/04/collecting-from-guarantors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 1996 03:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter R. Greene</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debtor-Creditor and Banking Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commencement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guarantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summary judgment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I. Introduction My topic is dear to the hearts of all credit officers, especially those in the special loans groups of our major financial institutions. I do not have a magical answer but hopefully my practical suggestions gained through my experience in numerous guarantee actions will be of assistance. II. Move Quickly It is imperative&#160;<a href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/1996/04/collecting-from-guarantors/">[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/1996/04/collecting-from-guarantors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
