<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Litigator - Affleck Greene McMurtry, LLP &#187; Conflicts of Law and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/topics/commercial-litigation/conflicts-of-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca</link>
	<description>Competition Law,  Commercial Litigation and Arbitration Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 01:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Supreme Court of Canada sets the rules on when Canadian courts have jurisdiction</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/04/supreme-court-of-canada-sets-the-rules-on-when-canadian-courts-have-jurisdiction/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-of-canada-sets-the-rules-on-when-canadian-courts-have-jurisdiction</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/04/supreme-court-of-canada-sets-the-rules-on-when-canadian-courts-have-jurisdiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth A. Dekker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflicts of Law and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Club Resorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conrad Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van Breda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=1341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today, Canada&#39;s Supreme Court released a trilogy of long-awaited decisions in which it set universal rules on when courts across Canada can properly take jurisdiction over claims against foreign defendants. The first two cases, Club Resorts Ltd. v. Van Breda et al. and Club Resorts Ltd. v. Charron et al., related to claims brought&#160;<a href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/04/supreme-court-of-canada-sets-the-rules-on-when-canadian-courts-have-jurisdiction/">[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2012/04/supreme-court-of-canada-sets-the-rules-on-when-canadian-courts-have-jurisdiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court of Appeal reconsiders test for jurisdiction over foreign defendants</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2010/04/court-of-appeal-reconsiders-test-for-jurisdiction-over-foreign-defendants/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=court-of-appeal-reconsiders-test-for-jurisdiction-over-foreign-defendants</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2010/04/court-of-appeal-reconsiders-test-for-jurisdiction-over-foreign-defendants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 01:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David N. Vaillancourt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflicts of Law and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court of appeal for ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forum non conveniens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interprovincial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morguard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muscutt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order and fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real and substantial connection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van Breda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volkswagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World-Wide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent decision, a five judge panel of the Court of Appeal for Ontario revised the legal test to be applied when the Ontario courts are asked to assume jurisdiction over a foreign defendant.  The Court’s decision in Van Breda v. Village Resorts Ltd. clarifies the applicable legal principles and should provide greater guidance to Ontario courts on whether and when they can properly take jurisdiction over foreign defendants.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2010/04/court-of-appeal-reconsiders-test-for-jurisdiction-over-foreign-defendants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
