<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Litigator - Affleck Greene McMurtry, LLP &#187; Attacks on Business Interests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/topics/commercial-litigation/attacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca</link>
	<description>Competition Law,  Commercial Litigation and Arbitration Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 01:52:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Court of Appeal Upholds $3 Million Judgment in Bad Faith Revocation Case</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2010/03/court-of-appeal-upholds-3-million-judgment-in-bad-faith-revocation-case/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=court-of-appeal-upholds-3-million-judgment-in-bad-faith-revocation-case</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2010/03/court-of-appeal-upholds-3-million-judgment-in-bad-faith-revocation-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Farahat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attacks on Business Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intentional interference with economic relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privileges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revoke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosenhek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statutory duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windsor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In its decision released earlier this year in Rosenhek v. Windsor Regional Hospital,[i]  the Court of Appeal for Ontario affirmed a $3 million judgment awarded to a doctor in his action against a hospital arising from the denial of hospital privileges to him. The Court concluded that the hospital’s Board of Governors had acted in bad faith in summarily revoking the doctor’s hospital privileges primarily because he didn’t “fit in” with his fellow staff members.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2010/03/court-of-appeal-upholds-3-million-judgment-in-bad-faith-revocation-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello! case says goodbye to confusion in economic torts</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2007/10/hello-case-says-goodbye-to-confusion-in-economic-torts/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hello-case-says-goodbye-to-confusion-in-economic-torts</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2007/10/hello-case-says-goodbye-to-confusion-in-economic-torts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>W. Michael G. Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attacks on Business Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic torts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inducing breach of contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unlawful interference with economic interests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House of Lords recently curtailed the scope of the torts of inducing breach of contract and unlawful interference, and expanded the reach of the tort of breach of confidence to cover a situation where a newspaper paid for the exclusive right to print photos of a celebrity wedding.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2007/10/hello-case-says-goodbye-to-confusion-in-economic-torts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
