The Litigator LiveThe Litigator Live
AGM :: Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP

THE LITIGATOR LIVE

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
365 Bay Street, Suite 200  ·  Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800  ·  info@agmlawyers.com

supreme court of canada

Commercial Litigation Update – November 2006

November 1st, 2006 | By Meredith Hayward | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Year in Review / The Litigator (Print Edition)

CONTRIBUTORS: MEREDITH HAYWARD, KENNETH DEKKER, PAUL EMERSON, KYLE PETERSON,AND ADAM WYGODNY SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CONFIRMS LITIGATION PRIVILEGE OF LIMITED DURATION In its first review of the lifespan of litigation privilege, the Supreme Court of Canada has recently ruled that, unlike solicitor-client privilege, it “expires with the litigation of which it was born.” … and [...]

Full article

Are courts more willing to enforce restrictive covenants?

September 15th, 2006 | By Sonny Ingram | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Employment Litigation

Prima facie all covenants in restraint of trade are illegal and therefore unenforceable. Recently, this pillar of the law of contract has been given a new, albeit off-putting, coat of paint.

Full article

Failure to identify changes in insured risks can render policies voidable

November 14th, 2005 | By Paul Emerson | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Insurance Defence

An insured must inform its insurer of any facts that affect its insurability or that an insurer would consider relevant in assessing risk. This duty to disclose such facts exists even in the absence of a specific request for them. An insured may face coverage issues if it breaches this obligation and withholds facts that [...]

Full article

Contractor pays for mistake in bid price

October 18th, 2005 | By Kyle Peterson | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Construction (including Performance and L&M Bond Defense)

A contractor who made a mistake in price in a tender cannot walk away from its bid, even if the tender instructions call for submission of additional documentation, in which the mistake becomes obvious, the Ontario Court of Appeal recently held.[1] This decision is an important re-affirmation of the principle that contractors are bound by [...]

Full article

The Investment Dealers’ Association found not to owe a duty of care to disgruntled investors

July 29th, 2004 | By Angela Yadev | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Securities Litigation

Morgis v. Thomson Kernaghan & Co. (2003), 65 O.R. (3d) 321 (C.A.) In a recent decision, Ontario’s highest Court considered whether liability can be imposed on the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (the “IDA”) for the economic losses sustained by investors in their margin accounts with an IDA member. As a result of sustaining substantial [...]

Full article

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
365 Bay Street, Suite 200  ·  Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800  ·  
.