<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Litigator - Affleck Greene McMurtry, LLP &#187; remedy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/tag/remedy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca</link>
	<description>Competition Law and Commercial Litigation Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Oppression does not guarantee relief</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/11/oppression-does-not-guarantee-relief/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/11/oppression-does-not-guarantee-relief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sonny Ingram</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disputes within Companies and Partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1976]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[248]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debentureholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superior Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Hu v. Sung,  Superior Court Justice David Brown confronted the question of what to do when a shareholder in a private corporation has wrongfully excluded another from the affairs of the company, but by the time of trial the company has ceased operations, has not turned a profit and there is no evidence the offending shareholder personally benefited from the oppression.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/11/oppression-does-not-guarantee-relief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent Ontario cases highlight the scope of the oppression remedy – and its limitations</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/03/recent-ontario-cases-highlight-the-scope-of-the-oppression-remedy-%e2%80%93-and-its-limitations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/03/recent-ontario-cases-highlight-the-scope-of-the-oppression-remedy-%e2%80%93-and-its-limitations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Dekker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bondholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulls eye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Corporations Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complainant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creditors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cumming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debentureholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.S.M.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Colin Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Superior Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario superior court of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppression remedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping mall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the corporate oppression remedy is a broad remedy that can provide relief to a wide range of shareholders and certain other stakeholders harmed when a corporation is run contrary to their reasonable expectations, it will not provide relief to arm’s length contracting parties who later find that their contract does not give them the protection they want.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/03/recent-ontario-cases-highlight-the-scope-of-the-oppression-remedy-%e2%80%93-and-its-limitations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

