<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Litigator - Affleck Greene McMurtry, LLP &#187; RBC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/tag/rbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca</link>
	<description>Competition Law and Commercial Litigation Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:10:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Statements to Securities Commission are protected by absolute privilege</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/12/statements-to-securities-commission-are-protected-by-absolute-privilege/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/12/statements-to-securities-commission-are-protected-by-absolute-privilege/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Dekker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attacks on Reputation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absolute privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinary proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraleigh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IIROC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment dealer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MFDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutual fund dealer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newbould]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualified privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quasi-judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salesperson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superior Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniform termination notice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his decision this Fall in Fraleigh v. RBC Dominion Securities, Ontario Superior Court Justice Newbould summarily dismissed an action brought by John Fraleigh against RBC Dominion Securities and one of its employees. The action was brought for allegedly false statements and testimony given before the Ontario Securities Commission claiming unusual trading activity in his RBC trading accounts – information that was later published in media reports. In dismissing Fraleigh’s action, Justice Newbould found that the claim arose entirely from testimony and other related communications to the OSC; communications that are protected by absolute privilege.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/12/statements-to-securities-commission-are-protected-by-absolute-privilege/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Departing employees and the ongoing battle over investment firm clients</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2006/11/departing-employees-and-the-ongoing-battle-over-investment-firm-clients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2006/11/departing-employees-and-the-ongoing-battle-over-investment-firm-clients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Dekker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerage firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean hands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[departing employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiduciary duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interlocutory injunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nesbitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-solicitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registered representative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restrictive covenant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellington West]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Competition is fierce among investment firms for top producing brokers and, more importantly, their books of business. Often this competition rears its head in the form of litigation against departing brokers and the new firms that employ them.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2006/11/departing-employees-and-the-ongoing-battle-over-investment-firm-clients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

