<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Litigator - Affleck Greene McMurtry, LLP &#187; oppression</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/tag/oppression/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca</link>
	<description>Competition Law and Commercial Litigation Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Business judgment rule does not trump unanimous shareholders’ agreement</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2010/01/business-judgment-rule-does-not-trump-unanimous-shareholders%e2%80%99-agreement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2010/01/business-judgment-rule-does-not-trump-unanimous-shareholders%e2%80%99-agreement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disputes within Companies and Partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrongful Dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business judgment rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority shareholder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppression remedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppressive conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholders' agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrongful dismissal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Directors of a corporation cannot invoke the business judgment rule to justify decisions that violate a unanimous shareholders’ agreement, the Ontario Divisional Court held recently.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2010/01/business-judgment-rule-does-not-trump-unanimous-shareholders%e2%80%99-agreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oppression does not guarantee relief</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/11/oppression-does-not-guarantee-relief/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/11/oppression-does-not-guarantee-relief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sonny Ingram</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disputes within Companies and Partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1976]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[248]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debentureholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superior Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Hu v. Sung,  Superior Court Justice David Brown confronted the question of what to do when a shareholder in a private corporation has wrongfully excluded another from the affairs of the company, but by the time of trial the company has ceased operations, has not turned a profit and there is no evidence the offending shareholder personally benefited from the oppression.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/11/oppression-does-not-guarantee-relief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent Ontario cases highlight the scope of the oppression remedy – and its limitations</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/03/recent-ontario-cases-highlight-the-scope-of-the-oppression-remedy-%e2%80%93-and-its-limitations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/03/recent-ontario-cases-highlight-the-scope-of-the-oppression-remedy-%e2%80%93-and-its-limitations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Dekker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bondholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulls eye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Corporations Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complainant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creditors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cumming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debentureholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.S.M.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Colin Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Superior Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario superior court of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppression remedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping mall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the corporate oppression remedy is a broad remedy that can provide relief to a wide range of shareholders and certain other stakeholders harmed when a corporation is run contrary to their reasonable expectations, it will not provide relief to arm’s length contracting parties who later find that their contract does not give them the protection they want.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2009/03/recent-ontario-cases-highlight-the-scope-of-the-oppression-remedy-%e2%80%93-and-its-limitations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court of Appeal overturns supervising judge’s ‘pre-emptive strike’ against Stelco directors</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/05/court-of-appeal-overturns-supervising-judge%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98pre-emptive-strike%e2%80%99-against-stelco-directors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/05/court-of-appeal-overturns-supervising-judge%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98pre-emptive-strike%e2%80%99-against-stelco-directors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 01:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Dekker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Corporations Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ontario court of appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppression]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In late March, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned the decision of Mr. Justice Farley to remove two new directors of steelmaker, Stelco Inc., during its restructuring under the Companies&#8217; Creditor s Arrangement Act (&#8220;CCAA&#8221;). In ordering the Stelco directors reinstated, the Court of Appeal highlighted that the discretion given by the CCAA to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/2005/05/court-of-appeal-overturns-supervising-judge%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%98pre-emptive-strike%e2%80%99-against-stelco-directors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

