The Litigator LiveThe Litigator Live
AGM :: Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP

THE LITIGATOR LIVE

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
365 Bay Street, Suite 200  ·  Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800  ·  info@agmlawyers.com

oppression remedy

Business judgment rule does not trump unanimous shareholders’ agreement

January 14th, 2010 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Disputes within Companies and Partnerships, Employment Litigation, Wrongful Dismissal

Directors of a corporation cannot invoke the business judgment rule to justify decisions that violate a unanimous shareholders’ agreement, the Ontario Divisional Court held recently.

Full article

Recent Ontario cases highlight the scope of the oppression remedy – and its limitations

March 6th, 2009 | By Kenneth Dekker | Posted in Commercial Litigation

While the corporate oppression remedy is a broad remedy that can provide relief to a wide range of shareholders and certain other stakeholders harmed when a corporation is run contrary to their reasonable expectations, it will not provide relief to arm’s length contracting parties who later find that their contract does not give them the protection they want.

Full article

Intercorporate transactions may be oppressive

June 13th, 2006 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Disputes within Companies and Partnerships, Securities Litigation

An unfair intercorporate transfer price system in place between Ford Motor Company of Canada and its US parent, Ford Motor Company, oppressed Ford Canada’s minority shareholders, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled in early 2006. However, because there was no evidence as to when these shareholders owned their shares, they were each entitled to only one day’s damages.

Full article

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
365 Bay Street, Suite 200  ·  Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800  ·  
.