The Litigator LiveThe Litigator Live
AGM :: Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP

THE LITIGATOR LIVE

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
365 Bay Street, Suite 200  ·  Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800  ·  info@agmlawyers.com

court of appeal

Commercial Litigation Update – November 2007

November 1st, 2007 | By Kenneth Dekker | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Year in Review / The Litigator (Print Edition)

CONTRIBUTORS: KEN DEKKER, MICHAEL OSBORNE, MICHAEL BINETTI,ADAM WYGODNY,AND HOOMAN ZARGARZADEH CANADA’S TOP COURT DISMISSES SHAREHOLDER CLASS ACTION AGAINST DANIER LEATHER In October, Canada’s Supreme Court upheld the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision overturning Canada’s first-ever securities class action judgment in favour of investors relating to alleged misrepresentations on an initial public offering. … and more. [...]

Full article

Shell corporation cannot bring application, Tribunal rule

November 2nd, 2005 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Competition Tribunal Litigation

Symbol Technologies Canada ULC v. Barcode Systems Inc.[1] A corporation that is no longer a going concern cannot maintain a private application under s. 75, the Tribunal held in October 2005. In early 2004, the Tribunal granted Winnipeg bar code equipment seller Barcode Systems Inc.leave to commence a private application to force Symbol Technologies Canada [...]

Full article

Buy, sell or hold: the duty to mitigate

October 18th, 2005 | By Harry McMurtry | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Securities Litigation

In two recent cases,[1] the Court of Appeal for Ontario clarified the extent of an investor’s duty to mitigate when a stockbroker fails to follow instructions. As the breach relates to the purchase or sale of marketable securities, an investor must act quickly to mitigate any losses. The investor may decide to hold a security, [...]

Full article

Shareholder/director not liable for “presumptive benefit” or “duty to explain”

October 18th, 2005 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Disputes within Companies and Partnerships, Frauds, Misrepresentation, Deceit

Major shareholders and directors of corporation are not liable for torts of the corporation because they “presumptively benefit” from those torts, or because of a duty to be aware of, explain, and correct, the tortious behaviour, the Court of Appeal recently held in A-C-H International v. Royal Bank of Canada.[1] The court also re-affirmed the [...]

Full article

Law firm must return fees earned by faithless fiduciary

October 18th, 2005 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Professional Negligence and Discipline Hearings

There is a new development in the saga of Monarch Entertainment, Robert Strother and Davis & Company. Strother’s former law firm, Davis & Company, has been ordered by the British Columbia Court of Appeal to disgorge fees paid to it by Monarch plus the profits it earned from another client because it acted in a [...]

Full article

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
365 Bay Street, Suite 200  ·  Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800  ·  
.