<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Litigator - Affleck Greene McMurtry, LLP &#187; Private Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/category/competition-law/private-applications-competition-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca</link>
	<description>Competition Law and Commercial Litigation Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Private applicants flock to Tribunal</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/2008/06/05/private-applicants-flock-to-tribunal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/2008/06/05/private-applicants-flock-to-tribunal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competition Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition Tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disputes within Companies and Partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iata paper tickets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadeau ferme agricole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators hockey tickets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.agmlawyers.com/litigatorrss.asp?file=archive/reslibrary_archives_private20080605_content</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What do hockey, chickens, and airlines have in common? They have all been the subject of recent <em><a href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/tag/private-applications/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag nofollow" title="Posts tagged with private applications">private applications</a> </em>in the <a href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/tag/competition-tribunal/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag nofollow" title="Posts tagged with Competition Tribunal">Competition Tribunal</a>.</p>
<p>On April 11, the Tribunal refused leave to John Annable to bring a private application attacking multi-game ticket packages&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/2008/06/05/private-applicants-flock-to-tribunal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parliamentary privilege trumps Competition Act, Tribunal rules</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/2007/09/10/parliamentary-privilege-trumps-competition-act-tribunal-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/2007/09/10/parliamentary-privilege-trumps-competition-act-tribunal-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competition Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Capital News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliamentary Press Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliamentary privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refusal to deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gautier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a 10 year struggle, Robert Gauthier, proprietor of now defunct The National Capital News Canada tried unsuccessfully to renew his application to the Competition Tribunal to force the Speaker of the House of Commons to grant him access to the Parliamentary Press Gallery.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/2007/09/10/parliamentary-privilege-trumps-competition-act-tribunal-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dolby complaint silenced</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/2007/06/14/dolby-complaint-silenced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/2007/06/14/dolby-complaint-silenced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Anti-Competitive Conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refusal to deal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sono Pro Inc., a Montreal professional audio equipment reseller, has lost its attempt to force Sonotechnique P.J.L. Inc. to supply it with Dolby products.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/2007/06/14/dolby-complaint-silenced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tribunal restores Sherbrooke store to Rona</title>
		<link>http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/2005/07/13/tribunal-restores-sherbrooke-store-to-rona/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/2005/07/13/tribunal-restores-sherbrooke-store-to-rona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Anti-Competitive Conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelitigator.ca/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On May 30, the <a href="http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/tag/competition-tribunal/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag nofollow" title="Posts tagged with Competition Tribunal">Competition Tribunal</a> ruled that home improvement retailer Rona Inc. can keep a store it had agreed to sell in order to gain Competition Bureau approval of its acquisition of competitor R&#233;no-D&#233;pot in 2003, because of a &#8220;change&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelitigator.ca/index.php/2005/07/13/tribunal-restores-sherbrooke-store-to-rona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
