The Litigator LiveThe Litigator Live
AGM :: Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP

THE LITIGATOR LIVE

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
365 Bay Street, Suite 200  ·  Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800  ·  info@agmlawyers.com

Disputes within Companies and Partnerships

Business judgment rule does not trump unanimous shareholders’ agreement

January 14th, 2010 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Disputes within Companies and Partnerships, Employment Litigation, Wrongful Dismissal

Directors of a corporation cannot invoke the business judgment rule to justify decisions that violate a unanimous shareholders’ agreement, the Ontario Divisional Court held recently.

Full article

Oppression does not guarantee relief

November 5th, 2009 | By Sonny Ingram | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Disputes within Companies and Partnerships

In Hu v. Sung, Superior Court Justice David Brown confronted the question of what to do when a shareholder in a private corporation has wrongfully excluded another from the affairs of the company, but by the time of trial the company has ceased operations, has not turned a profit and there is no evidence the offending shareholder personally benefited from the oppression.

Full article

Regulation of businesses in Canada through private litigation

September 1st, 2006 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Competition Law, Disputes within Companies and Partnerships

Regulation – Court decisions arising from private litigation under the common law (in Quebec, the Civil Code), and statutory remedies that supplement the common law, are an essential and often overlooked component of the regulation of businesses in Canada.

Full article

The cross-border woes of Conrad Black – the dilemma of differing approaches to self-incrimination in Canada and the US.

June 13th, 2006 | By Jennifer Cantwell | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Disputes within Companies and Partnerships, International and Domestic Arbitration

Conrad Black and other officers and directors of Ravelston must attend to be examined under oath, even though there is a risk that their evidence could be used against them in criminal proceedings in the US , the Ontario Court…

Full article

Intercorporate transactions may be oppressive

June 13th, 2006 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Disputes within Companies and Partnerships, Securities Litigation

An unfair intercorporate transfer price system in place between Ford Motor Company of Canada and its US parent, Ford Motor Company, oppressed Ford Canada’s minority shareholders, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled in early 2006. However, because there was no evidence as to when these shareholders owned their shares, they were each entitled to only one day’s damages.

Full article

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
365 Bay Street, Suite 200  ·  Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800  ·  
.