The Litigator LiveThe Litigator Live
AGM :: Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP

THE LITIGATOR LIVE

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
365 Bay Street, Suite 200  ·  Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800  ·  info@agmlawyers.com

Author Archive for Michael Osborne

Joint Venture Decision Criminal, Alberta Court Says

November 11th, 2011 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Competition Law, Conspiracy, Criminal Matters

An Alberta court has held that a decision by joint operators of an oil field to sole source a contract constituted a conspiracy contrary to section 45 of the Competition Act, a criminal offence, and awarded damages to the company that lost out on the business.

Full article

The Long Arm of US Law Grabs Canadian Executive

September 20th, 2011 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Competition Law, Conspiracy, Criminal Matters

Doing business in the US can be very lucrative. But Canadian (and other foreign) companies and their executives that engage in corrupt practices there can expect to face serious penalties there.

Full article

Competition Law Year in Review 2010

May 25th, 2011 | By Michael Binetti and Michael Osborne | Posted in Competition Law, Franchises, Year in Review / The Litigator (Print Edition)

Review of all Canadian Competition Law developments over the pas year, plus some US developments, including: Mergers, Criminal, Private Actions, Reviewable Matters, Marketing Practices, The Long Arm of US Antitrust

Top Stories

  • Indirect purchasers cannot sue
  • Damages no longer required?
  • The wired and the wireless
  • Winds of change
  • Credit card rules challenged… priceless?
  • Rebates, savings and gift cards

Full article

Discoverability does not apply to competition claims

May 12th, 2011 | By Fiona Campbell and Michael Osborne | Posted in Competition Law, Conspiracy, Private Actions

The Federal Court has recently ruled that the discoverability rule does not apply to extend the limitation period applicable to private actions launched to recover damages caused by breaches of the Competition Act.

Full article

Raising the AMPerage

January 10th, 2011 | By Michael Osborne | Posted in Administrative Law, Competition Law

AMPs have become widespread in administrative schemes in Canada because they fill a gap between traditional administrative and criminal enforcement tools. This paper explores the rationales that are behind the spread of AMPs in Canadian law. It outlines a number of AMP schemes in federal and provincial legislation. Finally, it discusses three issues that commonly arise in AMP proceedings: the availability of a due diligence defence, whether AMP provisions apply retrospectively, and interpretive difficulties raised by the novelty of language used in AMP provisions.

Full article

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
365 Bay Street, Suite 200  ·  Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800  ·  
.