The Litigator LiveThe Litigator Live
AGM :: Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP

THE LITIGATOR LIVE

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
365 Bay Street, Suite 200  ·  Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800  ·  info@agmlawyers.com

Archive for 2009

Statements to Securities Commission are protected by absolute privilege

December 2nd, 2009 | By Kenneth Dekker | Posted in Attacks on Reputation, Commercial Litigation, Securities Litigation

In his decision this Fall in Fraleigh v. RBC Dominion Securities, Ontario Superior Court Justice Newbould summarily dismissed an action brought by John Fraleigh against RBC Dominion Securities and one of its employees. The action was brought for allegedly false statements and testimony given before the Ontario Securities Commission claiming unusual trading activity in his RBC trading accounts – information that was later published in media reports. In dismissing Fraleigh’s action, Justice Newbould found that the claim arose entirely from testimony and other related communications to the OSC; communications that are protected by absolute privilege.

Full article

Oppression does not guarantee relief

November 5th, 2009 | By Sonny Ingram | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Disputes within Companies and Partnerships

In Hu v. Sung, Superior Court Justice David Brown confronted the question of what to do when a shareholder in a private corporation has wrongfully excluded another from the affairs of the company, but by the time of trial the company has ceased operations, has not turned a profit and there is no evidence the offending shareholder personally benefited from the oppression.

Full article

Norwich orders: Recent developments in the right to pre-action discovery in Ontario

October 27th, 2009 | By Jennifer Dyck | Posted in Commercial Litigation

Two recent Ontario decisions, GEA Group AG v. Ventura Group Co. and York University v. Bell Canada Enterprises and Rogers Communications Inc. have clarified the circumstances under which courts should grant the extraordinary equitable remedy of pre-action discovery, commonly known as a Norwich order.

Full article

Investment industry practice can be considered in determining whether contract is formed, Court of Appeal rules

October 8th, 2009 | By Christian Farahat | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Securities Litigation

In its decision earlier this year in UBS Securities Canada, Inc. v. Sands Brothers Canada, Ltd., the Ontario Court of Appeal examined the extent to which industry custom and common practice may be utilized in determining whether a contract has been formed between two parties. In particular, the investment industry practice of conducting multi-million dollar deals over the telephone was cited by the Court in finding that a binding agreement for the purchase and sale of shares had been concluded between the parties to this litigation and in ordering specific performance of that agreement.

Full article

Court of Appeal re-establishes IDA’s right to discipline former members

September 16th, 2009 | By David N. Vaillancourt | Posted in Commercial Litigation, Securities Litigation

The Ontario Court of Appeal has restored an earlier Ontario Securities Commission ruling, which held that the Investment Dealers Association of Canada (now known as the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada, or IIROC) retains the authority to discipline a former member for up to five years after that member has left the organization. The ruling also opens the door to IIROC and other SROs levying court-enforceable fines against former members.

Full article

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
365 Bay Street, Suite 200  ·  Toronto, Canada
416 360 2800  ·  
.